We need people to promote their OpenStack Sessions, but how much is too much?
Semi-annually, I choose to be part of the growing dog pile of OpenStack summit submissions. Looking at the list, I see some truly amazing sessions by committed and smart community members. There are also a fair share of vendor promotions.
The nature of the crowded OpenStack vendor community is that everyone needs to pick up their social media megaphones (and encourage some internal block voting) to promote their talks. Consequently, please I need to ask you to consider voting for my list:
- DefCore 2015
- The DefCore Show: “is it core or not” feud episode
- Mayflies: Improve Cloud Utilization by Forcing Rapid Server Death [Research Analysis] (xref)
- It’s all about the Base. If you want stability, start with the underlay [Crowbar]
- State of OpenStack Product Management
Why am I so reluctant to promote these excellent talks? Because I’m concerned about fanning the “PROMOTE MY TALKS” inferno.
For the community to function, we need for users and operators to be heard. The challenge is that the twin Conference/Summit venue serves a lot of different audiences.
In my experience, that leads to a lot of contributor navel gazing and vendor-on-vendor celebrations. That in turn drowns out voices from the critical, but non-block-enabled users and operators.
Yes, please vote those sessions of mine that interest you; however, please take time to vote more broadly too. The system randomized which talks you see to help distribute voting too.