I’ve been finding it necessary to quote Jevon’s paradox several times lately and realized that I have NOT referenced it here. Quite simply, understanding Jevon’s paradox is essential to understanding cloud.
The concept of the paradox is that when we make something more efficient (for example gas in cars), the demand for that resource goes up (we move further into the exurbs because driving is cheaper). Notably, as Moore’s law drives computer efficiency up, we are using more and more computers. Specifically, I have more computers in my house every year even though the efficiency of just one smart phone far (far) exceeds power of my son’s Sinclair 1000.
In cloud computing, Jevon’s paradox points us to the expectation that the rush of applications and activity in the cloud will continue to accelerate. Since I expect competition and Moore’s law to drive increasing gains in cloud efficiency (and therefore customer advantageous price signals) the market will happily convert these utilization improvements into more and more interesting capabilities.
The cloud expansion means that we can sustain more providers entering the market. In fact, Jevon would tell us that more providers will likely INCREASE demand for cloud as competition and capacity put downward pressure on prices. [Q: where will they make up the margin? A: Adjacent Services]
The loser in cloud’s exploration of Jevon’s paradox are non-cloud deployments (Dell strategists are you listening?). These systems suffer because their ability to improve their efficiency is limited.
As I look down the road on cloud, I can see many opportunities for current applications to take advantage of cheaper cloud resources to provide even more value. For example, adding map-reduce analytics to scan a customer’s data can provide tremendous insights. Today, it’s a luxury like flying on the Concorde. Tomorrow, it will be part like hopping the Nerd Bird from San Jose to Austin – just a normal part of our daily lives.
Note: A shout out to Dave McCrory who introduced me to Jevon’s Paradox.
Rob Hirschfeld 
Although I get the point, the parallels with cloud and Concorde maybe not where you want to go. After all, look what happened to Concorde and did you ever fly on it?
I did, it wasn’t luxury, it was just quick and expensive, almost a corollary to cloud. I think a better idea would be to compare to the Boeing 787, once they’ve worked the bugs out and worked out how to get the data in and out, it will deliver massive scale at a much more affordable price… http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787family/
And so, at least the Dell Product Group architects are listening 😉
LikeLike
Thanks 🙂 I was more thinking of the Concorde as a reference to state of the art analytics (which are expensive and fast) that have not (yet) been cloud-ized. Once we have reached cloud economies w/ analytics, then they will be more like the 787 (efficient and scalable).
LikeLike