Last week’s day-long Board Meeting (Jonathan’s summary) focused on three major topics: DefCore, Contribute Licenses (CLA/DCO) and the “Win the Enterprise” initiative. In some ways, these three topics are three views into OpenStack’s top issue: commercial vs. individual interests.
But first, let’s talk about DefCore!
DefCore took a major step with the passing of the advisory Havana Capabilities (the green items are required). That means that vendors in the community now have a Board approved minimum requirements. These are not enforced for Havana so that the community has time to review and evaluate.
For all that progress, we only have half of the Havana core definition complete. Designated Sections, the other component of Core, will be defined by the DefCore committee for Board approval in September. Originally, we expected the TC to own this part of the process; however, they felt it was related to commercial interested (not technical) and asked for the Board to manage it.
The coming meetings will resolve the “is Swift code required” question and that topic will require a dedicated post. In many ways, this question has been the challenge for core definition from the start. If you want to join the discussion, please subscribe to the DefCore list.
The majority of the board meeting was spent discussion other weighty topics that are work a brief review.
Contribution Licenses revolve around developer vs broader community challenge. This issue is surprisingly high stakes for many in the community. I see two primary issues
- Tension between corporate (CLA) vs. individual (DCO) control and approval
- Concern over barriers to contribution (sadly, there are many but this one is in the board’s controls)
Win the Enterprise was born from product management frustration and a fragmented user base. My read on this topic is that we’re pushing on the donkey. I’m hearing serious rumbling about OpenStack operability, upgrade and scale. This group is doing a surprisingly good job of documenting these requirements so that we will have an official “we need this” statement. It’s not clear how we are going to turn that statement into either carrots or sticks for the donkey.
Overall, there was a very strong existential theme for OpenStack at this meeting: are we a companies collaborating or individuals contributing? Clearly, OpenStack is both but the proportions remain unclear.
Answering this question is ultimately at the heart of all three primary topics. I expect DefCore will be on the front line of this discussion over the next few weeks (meeting 1, 2, and 3). Now is the time to get involved if you want to play along.
Pingback: OpenStack Community Weekly Newsletter (July 25 – Aug 1) » The OpenStack Blog
Pingback: OpenStack Community Weekly Newsletter July 25 – Aug 1 - OpenStack Superuser