PaaS Simplified: an application architecture that responds to load

handoff

In addition to attending the great sessions at the OpenStack Design Conference, our Dell team realized that we’ve been making Platform as a Service (PaaS) much more complex.  Stripping away the detritus is important because it looks like “What is a PaaS” is changing on a daily basis so boiling it down to the must fundamental is essential.

At its core, a PaaS is an application that changes its architecture based on the load.   That’s it no further definition is required.

I’ve been playing with this definition since April and am finding that it’s a much more productive definition of PaaS than any that I’ve used so far.  The reason is that it’s

  1. application focused,
  2. not language or services bound and
  3. captures the business use cases

Of course, I’m going to have to provide more backup in future posts.  I want to invite discussion about this perspective on PaaS.  I’m especially interesting in seeing how recent offerings from VMware (OpenPaaS/CloudFoundry) or Amazon (Elastic Beanstalk) measure against this concept.

Bad Premise: Cloud Outages are *not* driving IT back to premises

trapped

I wrote this responding to Lauren Carlson‘s (Software Advice) Blog Post.  Lauren – I’d be more likely to agree with the statement that “SLAs are dead”  Here’s why…

<soapbox>

Recent industry buzz about cloud service level agreements (SLAs) and reliability miss the core point about cloud.  Cloud is about agility, business models, consumerization of software and merciless pursuit of efficiency.

The fact that Amazon EC2 built its base without an “enterprise” SLA is exhibit #1 that the IT world changed and it’s not going back.

Here are my reasons why IT pandoras can’t get cloud back into the box.

#1. Cloud has vastly superior network connectivity

The concept of your users accessing your applications from inside your firewall is so 2005.  Today’s reality is that significant amounts of network access is externally routed means that applications need to live where they have excellent bandwidth to their users and to other applications.

#2. Cloud has elastic consumption of resources

Cloud is not less expensive infrastructure, it is mainly more flexible.  If you’re worried about an outage, then cloud is exactly the investment for you because you position a backup site at another location without having to pay for online resources.  It’s much harder to take down a site that invests the time to design a system that dynamically reallocates load between sites.

#3. Cloud drives more robust architecture

The fact that cloud delivery is more opaque and modular without a five 9s SLA has driven a cloud application architecture revolution (see CAP).  We have shifted the app paradigm from robust scale up hardware to robust scale out software.  Also significant, DevOps innovations have made deployments repeatable and adaptable.

The only “logical” argument for pulling applications back from the cloud is to assert control over more of the delivery chain for your application.  It the same reason that we think that driving is safer than flying – we’re the ones sitting behind the wheel when we drive.  News flash – driving is NOT safer than flying.

Cloud applications are not about hardware infrastructure, they are about SOFTWARE.  Perhaps one of the greatest disservices foisted on the market was saying cloud is synonymous with “Infrastructure as a Service” and “Virtualization.”  Cloud applications are powerful because we created ways that circumvent the limitations of IaaS and VMs!

</soapbox>

Cybera’s OpenStack efforts (includes Dell xrefs)

Cybera's Everett ToewsIt’s awesome to see new deployments of OpenStack so I wanted to point out Cybera’s post about their OpenStack efforts!

Everett Toews does a nice job talking about the rationale for their decisions including some analysis of their hardware and vendor selections.  Of course, I’m also happy to have them posting links back to my Dell team’s white paper and content. 

I wanted to highlight one point that Everett makes:

“Is this the best mix of hardware possible for OpenStack? As always the answer is, “It depends.” It depends primarily on your the use cases for your cloud. We think we got a good mix of hardware but time will truely tell if it was the best mix possible for DAIR.”

I strongly agree, we (Dell) are still recommending starting with a smaller set general purpose hardware config that can be easily repurposed.  Once you’ve figured out how your application maps into OpenStack then we’ll be ready to work togther to tune that order for 1000s of servers.

Not all APIs are equal: the power of API + implementation (OpenStack vs LibCloud vs DeltaCloud)

sky

I’ve been getting a lot of questions about Apache LibCloud and RedHat’s DeltaCloud vs. OpenStack.  While all of these projects offer APIs, only OpenStack is based on an implementation.

Having an implementation means that the API is reflected by code that delivers the functionality of the API.  This means that the implementation based API more closely reflects the actual workings of the system while the “pure” API must abstract the working of multiple systems.   The API only approach ends up having to become a least common deminator instead of a vision of the pure use cases.

LibCloud and DeltaCloud are important and useful.  They provide abstractions that help developers write applications without being tied to a specific cloud vendor.  While lack of lock-in is a concrete benefit, it comes at a price.  The price is that the API shim cannot expose features that differentiate the platforms.  This may represent a significant loss of functionality or performance.

When developers implement directly against an implemented API, they can take advantage of the full feature set of their target cloud.  They can also test and verify more directly.  These are significant benefits that result in richer, more robust and faster to market products.

Both approaches have their place and are needed in the market.  If I needed to write against multiple clouds for portability then Libcloud is a slam dunk.  If I needed rich features and an ecosystem then OpenStack or Amazon are better choices.

Hungry for Nova Cuisine? Adding Chef recipes for OpenStack Nova

As promised, here’s the other drop in advance of our OpenStack team’s Crowbar release. 

This is the second part of the Swift and Nova recipes that we are intentionally leaking out to the community.

USAGE NOTE: These recipes are designed to work with Crowbar!  They are not intended to stand alone.

As part of our collaboration with Opscode, Matt Ray, has been merging our recipes into his most excellent OpenStack cookbook tree.  If you want to see our unmerged recipes, we’re also posting those to our github

In addition to our Swift recipes, you can now check out the Nova recipes.

ADDITIONAL USAGE NOTE: The Matt’s tree is more complete – these are released for reference only.  They will ultimately be maintained as part of the Crowbar.

The OpenStack Rocket: How Citrix, Dell & Rackspace collaboration propels OpenStack

OpenStack has grown amazingly and picked up serious corporate support in its first year.  Understanding how helps to explain why the initiative has legs and where adopters should invest.  While OpenStack has picked up a lot of industry partners, early participation by Dell and Citrix have been important to a meteoric trajectory.

So why are we (Dell) working so hard to light a fire under OpenStack?

To explain OpenStack support and momentum, we have to start with a self-reflective fact: Dell (my employer), Citrix and Rackspace are seeking to gain the dominate positions in their respective areas of “cloud.”  Individually, we have competitors in more entrenched positions for cloud silos in solutions, ecosystem, and hypervisor; however, our competitors are not acting in concertto maintain their position.   

OpenStack offers an opportunity for companies trying to gain market share to leverage the strengths of partners against their competitors.

The surprising aspect of OpenStack is how much better this collaboration is working in practice than in theory.  This, dare I say it, synergistic benefit comes to OpenStack from all the partners (Dell, Citrix, Rackspace and others) working together because:

  1. Real scale clouds are big and complex with a lot of moving pieces (too big for a single vendor)
  2. A vibrant ecosystem needs to see commercial commitment from large players (and avoids lock-in)
  3. Having alternatives drives innovation and manages costs (because differentiation is still needed)
  4. Interlocking expertise is required (because no vendor has all the pieces)
  5. Customer needs are diverse and changing (since cloud is accelerating the rate of innovation)

Today, three major cloud players are standing together to demonstrate commitment to the community.  This announcement is a foundation for the OpenStack ecosystem.  In the next few months, I expect to see more and more collaborative announcements as the community proves the value of working together.

By aligning around an open platform, we collectively out flank previously dominant players who choose to go it alone.  The technology is promising; however, the power of OpenStack flows mainly from the ecosystem that we are building together.

Cooking up OpenStack Chef recipes with Opscode

Our OpenStack team here at Dell has been busy getting Crowbar ready to open source and that does not leave much time for blog posts.  We’re putting on a new UI, modularizing with barclamps and creating network options for Nova Cactus.

Sharing is goodHowever, I wanted to take a minute to update the community about Swift and Nova recipes that we are intenionally leaking out to the community in advance of the larger Crowbar code drop.

As part of our collaboration with Opscode, Matt Ray, has been merging our recipes into his most excellent OpenStack cookbook tree.  If you want to see our unmerged recipes, we’re also posting those to our github.  So far, we have the Swift recipes available (thanks to Andi Abes!) with Nova to follow soon.

5/31 Update: These are now online.

OpenStack discussion at 5/19 Central Texas Linux Users Group (CTLUG ATX)

image

Greg Althaus (@glathaus) and I will be leading a discussion about OpenStack at the May CTLUG  on 5/19 at 7pm.  The location is Mangia Pizza on Burnet and Duval (In the strip mall where Taco Deli is).

We’ll talk about how OpenStack works, where we see it going, and what Dell is doing to participate in the community.

OpenStack should be very interesting to the CTLUG because of the technologies being used AND way that the community is engaged in helping craft the software.